Видео

Very weird how obsessed this comment section is with the 'ick' comments.

Tom Holland is so on point - Great Guy.

Shall we address the elephant in the room? Louise, the oils you or he describe those who did not wear masks or get the vaccines during Covid as the non-conformist point of view? Or is that discussed in to content beyond the paywall?

Louise - The shades of the New Religion are the freedoms to discriminate rights to life & liberty. Let's simplify this - heresy thing - perhaps for the level of the tower block or the ghetto. I agree with Tom Holland that the 60's freed up the orthodoxy, perhaps to extremes. This was the new 20th. century ' Reformation ' Some freedoms have been good like the new Pentecostals - Christ has set the prisoners free - even from ' religion ' it seems - but what of ' holiness ' & 'repentance '? Is this a real precursor as needed to protect against the evil spirits & demons thrown to the lower heavens to influence the earth? Jesus said that He saw the devil/s fall from the heavens - this is Biblical truth. Look @ our time - the 21st. century with all the ' ai. ' inventions & ' gender ' ideology that change, even damage the moral power of logic & sense of peoples on earth! Jesus warned that - as in the days of Noah - so it will be at the times of the end of the age. Look around & take note from history. In Noah's day, there were demons & perversions with the ' Nephilim '.That is why the ' Spirit ' in the sky had to cleans the earth with the flood - to save it!? Now we have Technology & Chips of the body for present the day & its own perversions. Surely with the new ' free ' religions, there needs to be some structure like the neo-classical design of structures from the Greeks & Romans to anchor belief systems like the Nicene Creed & a basic credence to the fact that breaking the moral code invites trouble & demons into peoples & present confusions & this dispensation. We do have references to evil from the Assyrians & Babylonians though the Romans to the Mongolians & on to the Russians with Lenin & Stalin - not to mention the Germanic Nazis in World War 11. - all of which amounted to millions of people being annihilated, dispossessed & persecuted. The shades of the ' new religion ' are the freedoms to discriminate rights to life & liberty. - Louise/Tom we need more talks & discussions on this. Badger.

😘❤‍🔥💋💋💋

Impressed w Perry's knowledge, logic and courage.

I am a modern Muslim physician live in Europe,try to be open minded, working since 13 years. In West Earope HPV- associated cancer are on rise despite vaccination, single woman and men are more frustrated and depressed in comparison 10 years ago. Date Rape s are rising. Sorry but this sexual freedom just benefits men who like one night stands, it doesn't benefit women at all. How many women whose Lifestyle is one night stand report getting STD or rape from their sex dates, although they thought they have everything under control.

I think there might be a 3rd category: men who identify as women to win sports competitions.

Doing evil things and laughing. Psychopath? Sadistic? Malevolent?

Considering the "Biological Realities" females in particular reach, and currently all if the let's say, woke-ish policies in higher ed need serious scrutiny anyway, maybe Society could run an Experiment of sorts for say five years where only Married Students are weighted for PhD level admission and Post Docs. I am fairly certain it was policy, back in the Stone Age, that for single folks there were a series of "Gaps" built in between matriculation from Bs to Ma and larger gap for PhD. Which often DeFacto meant an older student, had "Real World (Job) experience, probably at least married and maybe the first child​ with another on the way. A MUCH more focused student that now realizes starkly how much "Real Life" ACTUALLY costs, let's say. Not to exclusion of some sort of Genius Savant or maybe Med, or Law School just maybe a nod to something of a Chesterton's Fence that got demolished and we are now seeing the 3rd or 4th order affects of across developed countries.

Le pen ruined the party and she distanced herself from her own fathe. That alone disqualifies her. She should have de-demonized France under original national front party

Every parent should see the film CHILDHOOD 2.0 because the game has changed. This world is not the same we grew up in. Being a non-conformist parent now means homeschooling, no phones or screens until closer to adulthood, and eating organic healthy diets.

The biggest change in the US is that white men are no longer hired by corporations and other bureaucracies. And that means the college credential is not as valuable to white men. If they get a Physics, engineering and computer science degree, then they will learn skills but the liberal arts/social science are of no real value for them. This means more men will be non-conformist and start businesses and such. Not unlike those who worked in the workshops and created the Industrial Revolution while the universities were not where the productive went.

The fertility rate in the US declined steeply from 1800-1940. It actually lessened in the 1930s. It then spiked until around 1958 and declined to lower than 1940 in 1980 but then popped back over 2 for the 1980s to 2000s then started dropping in 2010. With the much lower child mortality rate (100 per 1000 in 1930 to single digits today) and children no longer being an asset to the family business (farm), it is logical to have fewer children and invest more in them, such as college for all.

Humans advance on the efforts of the non-conformists. Unfortunately, universities are in the ideological conformist phase of The Priestly Cycle. Basically, back to the technophobic Cambridge/Oxford of the 17th century that meant the Industrial Revolution came out of the workshops of England rather than the universities while the 'elite' had their finishing school of backward thinking. "All mankind’s progress has been achieved as a result of the initiative of a small minority that began to deviate from the ideas and customs of the majority until their example finally moved the others to accept the innovation themselves. To give the majority the right to dictate to the minority what it is to think, to read, and to do is to put a stop to progress once and for all." --Mises, Ludwig von (1927). Liberalism

Yes!

HEKATE IS IMPOSTER...TRUE TRIPLE GODDESS HAKATE... PROOF? AKA ALL ALLIASIS...7 TONES OF CREATION ...WOMB OF CREATION... KA RA YA SA TA HA LA...LIGHTBODY AK AR AY AS AT AH AL SHADOW BODY...BIG BANG THEORY... HIGH AND LOW COURTS OF GODS SPIRIT COURTS OF EQUITY CLAIMS.....IMPOSTER MISOGYNIST HEKATE NO POWER...CURSE

Weirdly enough at the same time we have low birth rate we also have a global decline in sexual activity. I believe we need Sherlock Holmes back to solve this unexplained mystery. 😂😂😂

Just caught the end of LP's recent Diary of a CEO episode, and am reminded of the classic issue I have on this channel, which is basically with the impulse I find some ppl have to 'ban everything,' lol. However, I'm not sure if Louise's position has slightly shifted and/or become more nuanced, or if I have gleaned a more complete understanding of her positions, or both. In this case, the specific issue involved hypothetically banning all porn (albeit in the context of discussing abuses in the industry). Putting aside how we're probably somewhat differently calibrated on the "small l" libertarian relative to "small c" conservative meter (imo if anyone doesn't have at least a pretty good amount of both, that's a recipe for lunacy,) I mainly wanted to focus on the point regarding how 'outlawing something ppl still get away with potentially undermines the law'. I'm not discounting that point, I assume it's a concern to some extent. However, what I mainly want to say is that, that's not the biggest reason why the US Prohibition era (for example) was such a disaster. The big concern is that outlawing certain things will ACTUALLY FUEL a black market, of the kind that tends to be horrific, and the existence of which produces worse abuses than would typically take place if a behavior were legal, but regulated. (With the understanding that realistically, there are limits to the capacity for policing). I'm happy to acknowledge that, in liberal society, longstanding norms of good behavior make their way into law, primarily regarding extreme practices/behaviors, even when the concern of fueling a black market is absent (or of course, when something such as killing is so obviously unacceptable to everyone, that it's necessarily outlawed regardless of any other considerations). So then, when the concern of fueling a black market is absent? It matters a lot whether that's a realistic concern in a specific case or not, because often the only other remaining argument is that ppl SHOULD be legally permitted to do things that don't infringe, usually physically and immediately, on anyone else's right to life and liberty. If it's a gray area for that latter point, then the black market problem becomes practically the dealbreaker. Are the worst abuses of the sex industry the result of its existence? Or would they be worse and more frequent with legal prohibition? (Sounds like we both want women to mostly be permitted to do what they want with their bodies, but to never be literally trafficked in any form, and there are some good precedents for how those are legally disentangled). Or, (this is separate from "open drug scenes" which should be illegal,) take my own most Overton-pushing issue: Would legalizing (but regulating use/sale) of all drugs, disempower the cartels, if immediately instituted? (No, apparently for somewhat complicated reasons I can't succinctly recapitulate, it would do the opposite). After undermining cartel activity, would this subsequent legalization prevent the formation of future, dangerous black markets? (Almost certainly yes). Would this legalization be in keeping with the rights of adults to buy, sell and partake in whatsoever they wish, within the widest parameters practically possible? (Yes). My heuristic states that: the law should never be used to restrict something that norms, and civil society can sufficiently influence; and that the freedoms of individuals generally should only be legally restricted, when they infringe physically, intolerably, and usually (but not always) immediately, on the basic rights of other individuals. A necessary qualifier (especially for this channel) is of course, that children are not capable of assuming the full rights and responsibilities of adult individuals.

The worldview of so many progressives (your Midwestern NewYorker subscribers) is rooted in status anxiety, which is threatened by dissenting ideas, and *really* threatened by perceived apostates.

📰Subscribe to Maiden Mother Matriarch here to listen to full extended episodes: louiseperry.substack.com

This woman lies. People on the right were specifically targeted for censure, and lost their jobs. Some are still in prison. BTW…San Francisco is a s*#t hole. It used to be nice until people like her took over.

Thank you. Looking forward to your book.

I hope this woman doesn’t look at her book as a sort of penance. Many people lost their jobs, and families for asking relevant questions, and pointing out obvious problems. There WILL BE a reckoning!

You are dumb 🤣

I think many share Louise Perry's admiration for the Victorians . There's almost always a precursor among them for many of the 20th Century's great revolutionaries. Not for nothing did Einstein keep a portrait of James Clerk Maxwell in his study. About the 1950s, though, doesn't the book 'The Way We Never Were' skewer many of our preconceptions about that period?

The main thing that makes me distrustthe poly community is their scientifically crazy view of the societal norm of monogamy. Most of them seem to think it's people who are mutually mono by orientation oppressing people who are mutually poly by orientation, while the reality is obviously that most people are asymmetrical (having some interest in multiple partners themselves, but wanting exclusivity from their primary partnereven more strongly), such that monogamous norms are a game-theoretic equilibrium.

17:24 I think he is thinking of the georgian period. the victorian period saw huge reductions in the number of prostitutes, thanks to reforms coming from people like wilberforce.

The idea importing millions of thirds worlders is good because they work is delusional How did those apparently productive immigrants do Oh that's right Grooming gangs They all have to go back

Let me tell you a couple of three things: 1. Now have a cosy chat with Andrew Wilson. 2. The root of the problem is economics. Both husband and wife have to work to afford a decent lifestyle in the West. Consequently the housework and childcare are also split 50/50 (in theory). This means there is no longer any quid pro quo. As a man, what have you gained since you stopped being single? You worked and did the household chores then too. Now you've added childcare on top. Which you argue about. As well as the housework. A quick glance at Mumsnet shows the weird psycho-babble about "emotional labour" and "the mental load" (remembering appointments and updating the calendar, apparently) which you have to deal with, which is code for "woman stunned and dismayed to discover that having children, working and running a household isn't a Disney movie". If you think sex, let alone "romance" (which men give and women receive because "they are the table"), are sufficient recompense, you must never have cohabited, been married, or had children with a woman. You can forget sex for starters. 3. The most important lesson any straight - or even gay - man can learn, is to stop equating beauty with goodness. Forget the Tradcons with their "marriage is a sacrament, the cornerstone of a stable society, all you have to do is find a good Christian woman and divorce won't happen to you" nonsense. Protect yourself. Stop thinking with your d**k. A man who can't be manipulated by sex is halfway to invincible in this society. ESCAPE THE PLANTATION & DON'T LOOK BACK.

Something about "RED PILL" , the film , was a shock : it exposed how men feel/ think about relationships & family law bias ( but not talked about , openly , now it out in the open, a wall that hitting post modern culture,exposing male hardships) god bless Cassie

Me and my daughter have always had this discussion that girls are wearing is alarming and very scary

the low birth rate is caused by large cities, technology, and culture.

open borders is a preposterously stupid position, its frankly difficult to take anyone who holds that view seriously. and yeah- there may well have a large number of hookers in victorian london, there was also extremely widely spread geniunely grinding poverty.

📰Subscribe to Maiden Mother Matriarch here to listen to full extended episodes: louiseperry.substack.com

📰Subscribe to Maiden Mother Matriarch here to listen to full extended episodes: louiseperry.substack.com

Brian's arguments are so symptomatic of the degeneracy driven decline of America. It's all midwitish sophistry from the gutter. Children born to poly couples, just like children born through surrogacy, are headed for a lifetime ofpsychological hell, psychopathy and failure in life. It's cruel and the opposite of any true good.

I'm so glad she can make jokes about the state of our healthcare system. Almost like her party hasn't been in power for over a decade, overseeing it's demise... 🤔

This is why women are difficult to work with and just being around. They find a way to make everything about being offensive and tone police way too much. I say this as a psychologist.

50% of married women were prostitutes in Victorian England because a man's wages were only enough to support a single person.

Not everyone goes to University to get a job mate. Us working class just work after high school Governor😛

I made the mistake of spending time listening to this not knowing that you’d wait for an interesting question and put the rest behind a paywall. You can do what you want with your stuff but I feel stupid. I wish I knew at the beginning that you didn’t want me to watch because I wouldn’t pay.

Existence before Essence

Yes we have many forms of Individualist personal philosophy, Selfism , of course. This is another one .

About 20 min in and I’m not getting his point. Everyone is a “nonconformist” in some sense or we’d all be living the exact same life. I mean, the nonconformist rebel is a beloved archetype from Robin Hood to Tesla to James Dean to the panorama of gender nonconformities today & on & on & on. This isn’t an idea that’s lacking in history, advocacy, or implementation. I like putting some lemon essential oil in my smoothies -not the “norm” - I’m a proud smoothie nonconformist. Since it’s a given that nonconformity happens at all times everywhere I’m guessing what’s behind his banal cozy pitch of “embracing our uniqueness” or some shit is a idealistic view that norms are expendable for a certain group of people that those norms are holding back in the guise that it’s for everyone. I further guess those people have money and want to reconfigure society and we should all embrace that “nonconformity” cuz it’s good. Since those people are increasingly coming from big tech I don’ think it takes a genius to figure out who this “nonconformist” idea is for. If it isn’t this this guy isn’t saying anything beyond “try some shit out see how it goes”. We all do my guy, it’s called life. Maybe he says something that isn’t this axiomatic and lame at some point but so far in he’s either bullshitting out a meaningless book or isn’t saying the quiet part out loud

Get Walter Block on t discuss children's rights

Gotta be clear how we're using "blank slate" here. It's false, I'm not talking econ, I'm talking bio. Future gene editing will be more like, 'we can largely rewrite the slate'. The latest biophysics on phenotype is more like, 'various influences on genes can already, at least partly rewrite the slate'.

43:30 I resemble this remark

CREDENTIAL INFLATION. (I know, but make sure everyone else knows).

I'm sure Diana Fleischman and Geoffrey Miller can solve the math problem that allows them to raise a healthy family while doing the poly thing. And, I'm sure most ppl can't, lol.